Najib must explain the discrepancies between his announcement in Budget 2017 that Broadband speed will be doubled effective January 2017 and Tmnet announcement that the doubling in Broadband speed will be implemented in stages from Jan to June 2017.

During the tabling of Budget 2017, Najib had announced in Parliament that effective January 2017, fixed line broadband service providers will offer services at a higher speed for the same price.

Telekom Malaysia(TMnet) has rolled out a “Thank you Surprise” campaign to upgrade user’s internet speed. However, this upgrade will be implemented in stages from January to June 2017. In other words, there will be a certain group of users which will only receive the free internet speed upgrade as late as June.

Najib must explain the discrepancies between his announcement in parliament and TMnet’s “Thank You Surprise” campaign.

If Najib failed to explain the reason, he might have misled the parliament during his budget 2017 announcement. Tmnet should also compensate the group of users which will only receive their free speed upgrade in June.

TMnet’s “Thank You Surprise” campaign also requires users to key in their name, IC number, TM Homeline, Handphone number and email and to accept the free speed upgrade.

I urge Tmnet to save the user’s hassle and provide the free speed upgrade automatically, as some users might oversee their email and failed to respond to it.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Publicity Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 25 January 2017

Police must immediately investigate whether there is any misappropriation or abuse of power regarding the missing RM50 Million allocation under budget 2016 to Chinese Primary schools

DAP Perak has today lodged a police report regarding the missing RM50 Million allocation under budget 2016 to Chinese Primary schools.

According to the news report in China Press today, Finance Ministry has confirmed that the full allocation has been disbursed to the Education Ministry. However, the Education Ministry denied receiving the full RM50 Million allocation.

I have lodged a police report at IPD Ipoh this morning to urge the police to investigate whether there is any misappropriation or abuse of power regarding the missing RM50 Million allocation to Chinese Primary Schools.

It is unacceptable that when there is just 8 days remaining in 2016, 800 Chinese Primary Schools throughout the country has yet to receive a single cent of allocation. The same has happened last year when RM30 million of the allocation to the Chinese Primary Schools has been use for flood relief purposes.

In 2013 and 2014, no such cases were reported. All the RM50 Million allocation promised to Chinese Primary Schools were disbursed in full. However, after MCA rejoined the cabinet, problems start arising. In two consecutive years, during 2014 and 2015 allocations to the Chinese Primary Schools have been reportedly missing.

MCA’s saying “When you have someone in the government, things get done.”(有人在朝好办事) is nothing more than an empty slogan. I urge MCA to stop using such tactics to deceive the people. It has been proven over time, with MCA in the cabinet, more problem arises.

I also urge the police to investigate the missing allocation of RM25 Million to SMJK schools and RM50 Million to Catholic Schools.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, Political Secretary to DAP Perak Chairman and DAP Perak Publicity Bureau Chief on 23 Dec 2016

Is Liow Tiong Lai or Fadillah Yusof lying about the ECRL cost increase from RM30 Billion to RM55 Billion? Time for BN to come clean on the reason of the RM25 Billion cost increase and deny that the money will be used to bailed out 1MDB debts.

Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai yesterday explained that the East Coast Rail Link(ECRL) cost increase from RM30 Billion to RM55 Billion is partly due to the fall in Ringgit. Liow said the figures cited in the project’s feasibility study was based on 2009-2010 exchange rates.

He was reported saying “That time dollar is only RM3.2 to a dollar, now its RM4.2 and gone up to RM4.5.”

Works minister Fadillah Yusof has as recent as 27 July 2016, denied a report by Sarawak Report that the ECRL cost will be inflated from RM30 Billion to RM60 Billion to pay off 1MDB debts. He also denied that the increment in cost was discussed in cabinet.

What had happened in the span of 3 months that the cost of ECRL has almost doubled from RM30 Billion to RM55 Billion? Is Liow Tiong Lai or Fadillah Yusof lying? Both of them cannot be telling the truth on the RM25 Billion cost increase in ECRL.

If Liow is telling the truth, Fadillah Yusof denial that the ECRL cost will increase from RM30 Billion to Rm 60 Billion will be a big lie. The BN cabinet will also be one of the most incompetent and substandard cabinet in the world as three months before the signing of a multi-billion agreement, the cabinet is still unaware that the cost is calculated based on the exchange rate of 2009-2010 and subject to increase.

If Fadillah is telling the truth in July by denying the ECRL cost will be inflated from RM30 Billion to RM 60 Billion then Liow’s “exchange rate” explanation will be expose as a lie.

I urge Liow and Fadillah to both come forward and clarify as both of their version of explanation contradicts each other. It is time for Barisan National to come clean on the increment of the cost of ECRL.

Malaysians deserve to know why in the span of 3 months the cost of ECRL was inflated from RM30 Billion to RM55 Billion. Will the inflated amount be used to bail out 1MDB debts?

BN must come clean on the reason of the RM25 Billion cost increase and deny that the money will be used to bailed out 1MDB debts.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Economic Developement Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 3 Nov 2016

Teks Ucapan pembentangan analisa PRU14 Negeri Perak Di Konvensyen Pakatan Harapan Negeri Perak

I1. Sejak persempadanan semula oleh SPR, penganalisa politik berpendapat Keputusan PRU14 akan berpihak ke BN sekiranya persempadanan semula ini diluluskan.

2. Analisa ini adalah berlandaskan andaian di mana corak mengundi di PRU 13 akan kekal di PRU14.

3. Namun sejak 3 tahun yang lepas, berlaku satu anjakan paradigma di lanskap politik Malaysia dengan Penubuhan Amanah, Bersatu dan Warisan.

4. Isu-isu utama yang bakal menghayun pengundi di PRU14 termasuk GST, penghapusan subsidi bahan mentah, Kos sara hidup tinggi, harga tol meningkat dan kegawatan ekonomi.

5. Corak mengundi telah berubah dan Hukum hanyunan pendulum menunjukan pengundi akan memihak kepada Pihak pembangkang di PRU14

6. Analisa saya berdasarkan scenario PH mencapai persefahaman pilihanraya dengan Besatu dan berlawan PAS dan BN dalam 3 penjuru.

7. Komposisi kaum negeri Perak sebenarnya mirip dengan komposisi kaum negeri Selangor di mana Melayu 49%, Cina 37%, India 11% dan lain-lain 2%.

8. Terdapat 4 jenis kerusi di negeri Perak, Kerusi majority Melayu >80% 9 Kerusi, Kerusi campur dengan Melayu>65% 17 Kerusi, Kerusi campuran 14 kerusi, dan kerusi majority cina>50% 19 kerusi.

9. 14 Kerusi campuran merupakan medan pertembungan sebenar di Negeri Perak, parti mana yang boleh memenangi 14 kerusi ini akan memerintah perak.

10. % sokongan undi Melayu PRU13, PR30%.

11. Ramalan % sokongan pengunid Melayu PRU14, PAS 15%, PH 15% + Bersatu 20%, BN 50%

12. Jika PH boleh memenangi 35% Melayu, 80% Cina dan 50% India, PH boleh memenangi sebanyak 12 kerusi daripada 14 kerusi campuran.

13. PH harus menumpukan 80% sumber ke 20% kerusi campuran untuk memenangi Negeri Perak.

14. Analisa menunjukkan, Bersatu boleh memenangi 3 kerusi majority Melayu >80%, PH menang 7 kerusi Campuran Melayu >65%, 10 kerusi campuran dan 19 kerusi majority cina.

15. Berdasarkan % sokongan ini, analisa menunjukkan PH boleh memenangi 36 kerusi, Bersatu 3 kerusi dan BN 20 kerusi.

16. Pakatan Harapan mempunyai peluang yang cerah untuk mentadbir Negeri Perak menjelang PRU14.

Najib must explain why did he award the RM55 Billion East Coast Rail Link to China Communications Construction Company(CCCC) Limited, when CCCC was debarred by World Bank for fraudulent practices until January 12, 2017.

Najib has announced that the RM55 Billion East Coast Rail Link will be built and financed by China with the construction contract awarded to China Communications Construction Company, while a financing agreement will be signed with Export-Import Bank of China.

Najib must explain why did he award the RM55 Billion East Coast Rail Link(ECRL) contract which has almost doubled in price without open tender to a company that is dubious, questionable and engaged in fraudulent practices.

Firstly, the ECRL which was initially touted to be RM30 Billion has now almost doubled in cost to RM55 Billion. Works minister Fadillah Yusof has as recent as 27 July 2016, denied a report by Sarawak Report that the ECRL cost will be doubled from RM30 Billion to RM60 Billion to pay off 1MDB debts. He also denied that the increment in cost was discussed in cabinet.

What has happened in the span of 3 months that the cost for ECRL almost doubled to RM55 Billion. Najib must explain on what basis that the cost of construction increase by RM25 Billion in 3 months. Was the RM25 Billion increment in cost discussed and sanctioned by the cabinet?

Secondly, the China Communiations Constuction Company(CCCC) which was awarded the ECRL construction contract was debarred by World Bank for fraudulent practices. Under the sanction, CCCC is ineligible to engage in any road and bridge projects financed by the World Bank Group until January 12, 2017.

Najib must explain why the ECRL contract was awarded to CCCC without open tender when it was debarred by World Bank for fraudulent practices.

Sarawak Report has in July published a report that the ECRL cost will be inflated and the additional cost siphoned off to pay 1MDB debts. This claim, if true will be the biggest daylight robbery of Malaysian Taxpayers. Future generations of Malaysians taxpayers will be squandered Billions of Ringgit to pay off the scandalous and mismanaged 1MDB debt.

I call on Najib to immediately give a proper and reasonable explanation on the haste in awarding the inflated ECRL contract to a Chinese company which is dubious, questionable and engaged in fraudulent practices.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Economic Developement Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 3 Nov 2016

Najib new tiered corporate income tax rate announced in budget 2017 is not only cumbersome and complicated but also subject to tax manipulation.

Najib announced a new tiered corporate income tax rate in Budget 2017 based on the increment of chargeable income as below

Increment of chargeable income Reduction in tax rate Tax rate
5% or below None 24%
5% – 9.99% 1% 23%
10% – 14.99% 2% 22%
15% – 19.99% 3% 21%
20% and above 4% 20%

Firstly, this new tiered corporate income tax rate is subject to tax manipulation and will especially benefit multinational companies which have a group of companies. For example, a group of companies which comprise of company A, company B and company C may pool their revenue under company B and company C and park them under company A, thereby increasing its chargeable income to enjoy a lower tax rate (20%).

SME or smaller companies with only a single entity however could not benefit from this method except for expanding their business to increase their chargeable income up to 20% which seem unlikely in the current economic climate.

The IRB(Inland Revenue Board) will also incur extra administration cost to audit and administer this new tiered corporate tax rate based on increment of chargeable income.

Secondly, companies may be inclined to withhold investment in capital expenditure in the next two years in view of this new tiered tax rate. By not investing in new capital expenditure, thus claiming less Capital Allowances, the company’s chargeable income will be relatively higher to enjoy the new reduced tax rate.

Since the new tiered corporate tax rate is effective for 2017 and 2018, this will encourage companies to defer whatever investment(in capital expenditure) they can defer until 2019. This effect when aggregated will significantly hurt the country’s GDP, and negatively impact Malaysia economy in the coming two years.

It is clear that Najib administration is not sincere in reducing corporate tax rate. On one hand, Najib feared the loss in tax revenue, on the other hand Najib also feared public backlash if there is no corporate tax rate reduction announced, this give birth to the proposed monstrous tiered rate system based on the increment of chargeable income.

Najib should have announced a direct reduction of corporate tax rate instead of using the current proposed tiered rate which is cumbersome complicated and subject to tax manipulation.

Media Statement by DAP Perak Economic Development Bureau Chieft and Political Secretary to MP Taiping, Chong Zhemin on 22 Oct 2016

Barisan Nasional should send Najib back to school to learn basic Economics if he does not understand an expansionary fiscal policy – to decrease taxes or to increase government expenditures(or both) in order to fight recessionary pressure.

I refer to the reply made by Prime Minister Najib in Dewan Rakyat yesterday in response to Kluang MP, Liew Chin Tong’s question whether the government will consider lowering the GST from 6% to 3% in order to boost private consumption. Najib responded to the question by saying “Without GST, Malaysia’s economy will be crippled.”

What Najib said cannot be more wrong as what will cripple the economy is the shrinking domestic demand that will bring Malaysia economy into a spiraling recession.

It ought to be basic to any economics students that the Keynesian theory advocated lower taxes and increased government spending to stimulate demand and pull the economy out of a recession.

There is no denying that Malaysia is heading towards an economic slowdown, if not addressed, will quickly turn into another economic downturn or recession. All economic indicators have clearly shown that Malaysia economy is slowing down moving into 2017 with exports weakening in the first half of 2016 and GDP growth slowing down. According to data released by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia’s GDP grew 4.1% in the first six months of 2016, compared with 5.3% in the corresponding period last year.

It is imperative that the Government cut taxes to boost private consumption in order to save the Malaysia Economy. For example, the UK had in 2008 cut the VAT from 17.5% to 15% to boost the country’s economy.

The suggestion to cut taxes to boost private consumption has also been backed by AllianceDBS Research chief economist Manokaran Mottain.

Manokaran Mottain was quoted by StarBizWeek to have said the below

“what the economy needs is to boost private consumption by cutting the goods and services tax (GST)”

“The GST is a broad-based tax, a 1% cut will help more people than an income tax cut, as far fewer people pay income tax,”

Manokaran suggests that the GST be reduced to 5% from 6% for a limited period to boost consumption rather than cutting personal income tax. A cut in the GST rate will mean a loss in revenue, which Manokaran and others argue can be made up from the rise in oil-related revenue since the average price of oil is higher than the revised Budget 2016 oil price assumption.

It is clear that economists and researchers are propagating a cut in GST to boost private consumption which makes up 54% of the country’s GDP. There is no basis in Najib’s statement that “Without GST, Malaysia economy will be crippled.”.

Barisan Nasional should send Najib back to school to learn basic Economics if he does not understand an expansionary fiscal policy – to decrease taxes or to increase government expenditures(or both) in order to fight recessionary pressure.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Economic Developement Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 18 October 2016

Is UMNO’s act of throwing hell note in front of DAP office a “new style of politics” that Abdul Rahman Dahlan trying to promote?

BN strategic communications director Abdul Rahman Dahlan accused the DAP resorting to the old style of confrontational politics. Abdul Rahman Dahlan claim could not be further from the truth as DAP has always engaged in mature and constructive criticism type of politics.
In fact, if Abdul Rahman Dahlan would like an example of “old style confrontational politics”, he needs look no further than the party he is in. With UMNO youth holding a protest at DAP National HQ yesterday, throwing hell notes, clashing with the police and shouting racist slogans, this is a perfect example of “old style confrontational politics”.
Or is UMNO’s act of throwing hell note in front of DAP office a “new style of politics” that Abdul Rahman Dahlan trying to promote?
If Abdul Rahman failed to criticize the uncivilized UMNO youth behavior, his accusation against the DAP is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black.
Abdul Rahman Dahlan must keep in mind that Nga is a victim in this issue where a facebook page which he is unrelated to put up a “dedak” cartoon posting. Nga in all material time has never drawn or uploaded the said cartoon to facebook.
Nga has lodged a police report to investigate the facebook post and he will provide his full cooperation to the police. An appointment has been made with the police to record statement in Bukit Aman next Monday.
I urge all parties will remain calm in this incident and let the police investigate the case professionally before making unfounded accusation.
Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Publicity Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 13 July 2016

Muhyiddin should revealed evidence of Najib involvement in 1MDB and SRC international or risk breaking Criminal Procedure Code section 13 if convicted can be jailed up to 6 months.

  Two days ago, Muhyiddin has said that he has clear evidence of Najib involvement in 1MDB and SRC international but refused to reveal the evidence as the matter has not gone to court.

DAP Perak has today lodged a police report at IPD Ipoh to urge the police to investigate the authenticity of Muhyiddin’s claim, whether he genuinely hold evidence of Najib involvement in 1MDB and SRC International.

If Muhyiddin has evidence of Najib involvement in 1MDB but refused to reveal, he might risk himself breaking the law. It is an offense under the Criminal Procedure Code Section 13 refusing to reveal evidence of the commission of a crime which is punishable up to 6 months jail.

Muhyiddin must be brave enough to reveal the evidence against Najib as this involve the people’s trust against the country’s highest leadership.

Muhyiddin has signed the Citizen declaration yesterday which support the removal of Najib as PM of Malaysia through non-violent and legally permissible means. There is no reason for Muhyiddin not to reveal the evidence of Najib’s involvement in DB and SRc International. Muhyiddin should immediately hand in the relevant evidence to the police to take further action.

Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Publicity Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 5 March 2016

The UN Report that Malaysia’s poorest households are worst hit by GST is proof that Malaysia’s GST model is still regressive despite Malaysia having the longest list of zero rated goods in the world.

Malaysia’s Millennium Development Goals Report 2015 which was jointly released by the United Nation and Economic Planning Unit of the Prime Minister’s Department yesterday said that Malaysia’s household on the bottom 40 percent (B40) of the income spectrum are worst hit by the GST implementation. The B40 household income balance reduce from RM522 to RM400.
The Millenium Development Goals Report 2015 is proof that Malaysia’s GST model is still regressive despite Malaysia having the longest list of zero rated goods in the world making it the most complicated and cumbersome GST implementation.
Putrajaya has long argued that Malaysia’s GST model is not regressive due to the long list of zero rated goods. Despite the long list of zero rated goods, it is almost impossible for the B40 households to merely depend on zero rated list products and goods to survive.
For example, although bread is in the zero rated list, only white bread and whole meal bread are zero rated, bread with kaya filling, peanut filling and butter filling are tax at 6%. Although chicken is in the zero rated list, marinated chicken is taxed at 6%. Although cooking oil from oil palm, coconut and groundnuts are zero rated, cooking oil from sunflower, corn, safflower, soybean and olive are taxed at 6%.
Basic necessity food items such as milo, instant noodles, biscuits, canned food and bottled condiments are all taxed at 6%. How can the government expect Malaysia’s poorest household to solely feed on goods and products on the zero rated list?
Despite the government chest thumping and assurance, the fact remains that Malaysia’s poorest households are worst hit by GST and Malaysia’s GST model is still regressive.
Najib has revealed last month that the GST collection to date is RM51 Billion. The RM51 billion amounted to GST collected for 9 months since 1 April 2015. This figure if pro-rated will amount to an annual GST collection of RM68 Billion.
During the tabling of budget 2016 last year, the government expected to collect a RM39 Billion of GST revenue in 2016. The RM68 Billion of GST revenue is almost twice the amount Putrajaya expect to collect and almost 4 times of RM18 Billion of SST collected in 2014.
The GST revenue collection has exceeded the expected collection figure by twice the amount which means the 6% GST rate was set at an unreasonably high rate. It would only be fair to Malaysians that the government reduce the GST rate from 6% to 3%. This would also ease the B40 households from the GST burden.
Media Statement by Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Economic Development Bureau Chief and Political Secretary to Taiping MP on 24 February 2016